To spark interest among your audience — referees and journal readers alike — provide a compelling motivation for the work presented in your paper: The fact that a phenomenon has never been studied before is not, in and of itself, a reason to study that phenomenon.Write the context in a way that appeals to a broad range of readers and leads into the need.Tags: Outline For ThesisDissertation Binding NottinghamStatistics Coursework Pocket MoneyArgumentative Essay ImmigrantsAcid Rain Research ArticleTax On Junk Food EssaysEthical Dilemma And EssayFace Recognition Thesis 2012
Do not include context for the sake of including context: Rather, provide only what will help readers better understand the need and, especially, its importance.
Consider anchoring the context in time, using phrases such as recently, in the past 10 years, or since the early 1990s.
(Papers reporting something other than experiments, such as a new method or technology, typically have different sections in their body, but they include the same Introduction and Conclusion sections as described above.) Although the above structure reflects the progression of most research projects, effective papers typically break the chronology in at least three ways to present their content in the order in which the audience will most likely want to read it.
First and foremost, they summarize the motivation for, and the outcome of, the work in an abstract, located before the Introduction.
For the task, the effects of a range of inhibitors of connexin channels, such as the connexin mimetic peptides Gap26 and Gap27 and anti-peptide antibodies, on calcium signaling in cardiac cells and He La cells expressing connexins. In any case, the paragraphs in these sections should begin with a topic sentence to prepare readers for their contents, allow selective reading, and — ideally — get a message across.
Even the most logical structure is of little use if readers do not see and understand it as they progress through a paper. Most Materials and Methods sections are boring to read, yet they need not be.
Write four components, probably (but not necessarily) in four paragraphs: context, need, task, and object of the document.
At the beginning of the Introduction section, the context and need work together as a funnel: They start broad and progressively narrow down to the issue addressed in the paper.
Start by stating the actual situation (what we have) as a direct continuation of the context.
If you feel you must explain recent achievements in much detail — say, in more than one or two paragraphs — consider moving the details to a section titled State of the art (or something similar) after the Introduction, but do provide a brief idea of the actual situation in the Introduction. Emphasize the contrast between the actual and desired situations with such words as but, however, or unfortunately.