Discursive Essay Designer Babies

Discursive Essay Designer Babies-22
Reproductive technologies, far from being tools of liberation, were in fact seen as tools of oppression, providing yet another means by which the patriarchy could erode womens control over their own bodies and lives.At the same time, in a slightly different forum, however, other feminist theorists were critiquing the assumptions that underlay both positions.For us women, for nature, and for the exploited peoples of the world, this development is a declaration of war.

Tags: Berklee Essay Prompt 2012Oxford Essay PrizeDrug Addiction In EssayWhat Is Respect EssayAp Language And Composition Grading Rubric Argument EssayEssays About Sri Lanka TourismCs101 Assignment SolutionPast Dissertations FinanceHomework Necessary

With the rapid pace of reproductive technological development, it seems possible that Firestone’s demand will be met – ‘natural’ reproduction could indeed become a thing of the past.

Yet as reproductive technologies developed, feminists began to notice several problems with the way these technologies were being implemented.

uses cookies to personalize content, tailor ads and improve the user experience.

By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies.

This issue draws many similarities to abortion and embryonic research debates in that it is primarily concerned with embryonic status.

A widely accepted judgment on what constitutes embryonic status may never be reached, but it is important to note the circumstances in which PGD was used in this situation. Google(); req('single_work'); $('.js-splash-single-step-signup-download-button').one('click', function(e){ req_and_ready('single_work', function() ); new c. In her utopic vision of an egalitarian future, child-bearing would no longer fall to a woman by virtue of her biology, but rather would be taken over by technology, thereby leaving women free to enter the male-dominated public sphere, and enabling a social change that would encourage men to share the difficult responsibilities of child-rearing.Far from freeing women from the ‘tyranny of reproduction’, new technologies seemed to be enforcing the need for women to reproduce – creating a reproductive imperative that held that motherhood was the natural state for all women, whatever the cost.Furthermore, according to the anti-technology argument, women’s bodies were becoming experimental sites, being subjected to new and untested procedures that both exploited women’s bodies, and reinforced the classist, racist, and heterosexist beliefs of patriarchal ‘technodocs’ - white, middle aged, middle class men – who, in an attempt to play God, restricted access to technologies to women imagined to be ‘proper’ mothers – namely white, wealthy, married women (Albury 1984).Adopting such an approach, the body is seen as central site for feminist inquiry – the key to understanding women’s experience in a gendered social world.As Grosz puts it, for corporeal feminists, “the body can be seen as the crucial term, the site of contestation, in a series of economic, political, sexual and intellectual struggles” (19). Looking at how reproductive technologies themselves create and produce specific bodies allows for the recognition of the complexities inherent in the proliferation of reproductive technologies, and challenges feminist theorists to investigate questions of agency, desire, power, resistance and politics.(Klein 258) Reproductive technologies and their eugenic potentialities were condemned by the members of FINRRAGE on the basis that they divided, fractured, and separated the female body into distinct parts for its scientific recompilation, thereby disrupting reproductive continuity and fragmenting womens identity.Further, they allowed for the “take-over of our bodies for male use, for profit making, population control, medical experimentation and misogynist science” (Klein 259).From this perspective, the female body was neither a hindrance to be overcome, as is implicit in Firestone’s position, nor a natural site of feminine power to which women could return, as it was understood by the members of FINRRAGE.Instead, this broad group of feminists argued that the investigation of body itself ought to be at the centre of feminist inquiry.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Discursive Essay Designer Babies