PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES: Political philosophy, gun control SYNOPSIS: On April 20, 1999 Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold entered Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado a suburb of Denver and in a 15 minute shooting spree killed 13 people and wounded 21 others.Moore suggests that the shootings are part of a larger American culture of fear that prompts us to act with violence. A woman similarly stated, When a criminal breaks into your house, whose the first person that youre gonna call? If you are not going to protect your family, who is?
PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES: Political philosophy, gun control SYNOPSIS: On April 20, 1999 Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold entered Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado a suburb of Denver and in a 15 minute shooting spree killed 13 people and wounded 21 others.Moore suggests that the shootings are part of a larger American culture of fear that prompts us to act with violence. A woman similarly stated, When a criminal breaks into your house, whose the first person that youre gonna call? If you are not going to protect your family, who is?Tags: Essay On Natural CalamityTopmarks Problem SolvingNational Average Sat Essay ScoreCollege Essay About FamilyBook Report Bulletin Board TitleEssay Transitions In Spanish
Because of this, the film employs a nationalist narrative, to borrow Benedict Anderson's definition of a nation as “an imagined political community—and imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign,” thereby limiting Moore's political community to nearly entirely white people.
I find Said's diagnosis of the canonical authors Nerval and Flaubert's problematic attitude that the Orient “was a world elsewhere, apart from the ordinary attachments, sentiments, and values of our world in the West”: the bodies of color subjected to state violence and repression; and the white perpetrators of racism whose actions are rendered humorously stupid or, in the case of witnesses like Charlton Heston, inescapably evil.
It is certainly a gross understatement to contend that he is the only cultural critic today who could produce and release a film connecting the damning dealings of the Bush family with the bin Ladens two months before the 2004 election, however uncertain its distribution status is at the time this article goes to press.
Moore's renegade interviews directly confront political and corporate abuses and criminals in a manner altogether absent from the current proliferation of celebrity news journalism, and his generally clever deployment of humor guarantees that his pranks create and politicize a TV, film, and reading audience that is not otherwise being addressed.
In his award ceremony speech, Moore attacked George Bush for launching war against Iraq. Are militia groups such as this more damaging to the American way than this militia member suggests? James Nichols, brother of Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols, stated the following: If the people find out how theyve been ripped off and enslaved by the government, the powers that be, they will revolt with anger, with merciless anger. When the government turns tyrannical, it is your duty to overthrow it. We may have differences, yes, and we will again suffer tragedy almost beyond description. Moore discusses the impact that the Columbine shootings have had regarding increased school security throughout the country. Moore notes that many social influences were blamed for the Columbine incident, such as angry heavy metal subculture; absent parents; violent movies; South Park; video games; television; entertainment; Satan; cartoons; doom; society; toy guns; drugs.
Moore interviewed members of the Michigan Militia the organization to which the Oklahoma City bombers formerly belonged. Nicholss argument parallels the social contract defense of revolution that we find in the Declaration of Independence. He didnt have any guns and he beat the British Empire. Why would someone like Nichols not adopt Gandhis approach? Moore asks Nichols if he should have the right to have weapons grade plutonium. Moore counters Oh, so you do believe in some restrictions. But when the sun sets on Denver tonight, and forever more, let it always set on we the people, secure in our land of the free and the home of the brave. Hestons point is that, although Columbine was a tragedy, the potential loss of our freedom (specifically freedom to carry guns) is a greater tragedy. One school superintendent stated, Its almost like guerilla warfare; you dont know from which direction the enemy will be coming. Although Moore rejects all of these explanations, are any more compelling than others? Moore notes that other countries are also exposed to the above influences, yet have only a fraction of the gun killings that occur in the United States. Crime rate has been dropping, but fear of crime has been increasing.Is this better or worse than Moores culture of fear explanation? Discussing the school shooting of a six year old girl in Flint Michigan, Moore suggests that part of the problem was Michigans Welfare to Work program which the shooters single mother was participating in.Specifically, she had to travel an hour and a half to work every day to pay off the welfare.Are the two really symptoms of the same American problem, as Moore suggests? Ten days after Columbine, Charlton Heston held an NRA pro-gun rally in Denver. Manson in turn stated that the atmosphere surrounding Columbine was grounded in fear and consumption: keep everyone afraid, and theyll consume.During the rally he stated, I have a message from the mayor, Mr. Mansons point, which Moore agrees with, is that businesses encourage fear since it sells products.Is this a compelling explanation of the cause of fear? Moore contrasts the high level of fear that Americans have with the low level of fear that Canadians do. Moore states, Night after night the Canadians werent being pumped full of fear.In a speech he gave after the release of Bowling for Columbine, he tells his audience to turn off the TV.The part of when the two boys, the survivors went and bought the bullets and went to the CEO to make a statement, would their actions make what happened to them gratifying, even though their wounds never actually healed would the emotional wounds really heal.Moore may have been excessive in the movie when pointing out the beliefs and criticisms, but I think the point does get across through those actions.Do governments have responsibilities to root out the hotheads? Moore felt that, since Canadians have as many guns as we do, there must be some other reason for the high level of gun killings in the United States.However, it seems that Moores comparison neglected some key variables, such as types of weapons available, typical gun owners, rural vs. A standard explanation for much gun violence is a combination of poverty, unsupervised youth, drug abuse, and easy availability of guns.